Wednesday, September 27, 2006




so you should probably read the post beneath this one for clarification, and to set the tone for today's "diamond themed" entry.

but this is just a silly little side note, so feel free to ignore my above-mentioned statement.

let me ask you this: i know in those weird heterosexual relationships come marriage/proposal time it's the missus who gets to sport the shiny bling on her infamous finger...but what about in gay relationships?

now gay marriage is a tad bit on the controversial side still (unfortunately, but with people like brad pitt and angelina aka brangelina taking stands by saying that they won't be getting married in this country until everyone else who wants to get married CAN, we can't be far off...right? seeing as how brangelina rule the world and all...anywho...) but humor me for a sec.

have the gays thought about this yet? who gets the diamond? is it the more feminine of the couple who gets lucky? what about in lesbian relationships? do the same rules apply? hasn't someone wrote a book on the norm in ring-baring rules for the gays??

what are we to do?

well i'll tell you something; i'm usually deemed 'the woman' in any relationship i've partaken, so come hell or high water i'm getting a diamond!!! no longer will it be simply the 'females' of the world who can happily sport the debt-inforcing tribute to your relationship on their left hand...it's time the gays took back their rightful right in the jewelry department, and started wearing the blinding rocks as a symbol of their probably-doomed relationships (ahem)...

so there.

No comments: